Earlier this year, we received an overwhelming response to our CTO John Whaley’s session on securely implementing BYOC at RSA, and this got us thinking: what else would you like to hear about from MokaFive?
As we’re gearing up to submit a speaking proposal for VMworld 2011, we would like to hear from YOU what sort of topics you find interesting. Please leave a comment to let us know your ideas. Our goal is to create a submission and presentation that most applies to you and your organization by the end of the week, so chime in and let us know!
{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
I’d be curious to hear a talk on post-event forensic investigation in local hypervisor solutions on end devices not owned by the company. For example in a traditional environment, if an employee commits fraud from a corporate asset, and the employee takes it home and hides it, there is court precedent that the company has a legal right to seize that asset. If the case of local hypervisor though, the company owns the LivePC, but not the host computer. If the employee commits fraud inside the LivePC, will courts stand behind the company when attempting to seize the host computer? This is more of a legal and policy discussion moreso than a technical one. I know we can remotely revoke/kill a LivePC, so it’s not the protection of corporate data in discussion here, but rather the ability to prove (legal definition of “prove”) what an associate did or did not do inside a LivePC, considering the employee does not want to give us physical access to the computer. I was just curious what other companies were doing in this regard. Possibly handling it through specific language in the employement contract? Any legal precedent in this area favoring the company that you know of?